News
Flash
Bushmen win Court Case |
Introduction
to the Bushmen |
Joe
H.......... You emailed me 24th January 2007 concerning
Family History - Your return email does not work - Please
re-contact |
|
Tainted
Victory in Botswana
The
Situation in Botswana may not yet be resolved with the Botswana
Government taking obstructive action against Bushmen trying
to return to the Central Kalahari Reserve. This is despite
the landslide legal victory allowing them access to the lands
they were evicted from.
Unfortunately
I do not have time to constantly update this web site with
the rapidly developing (almost daily) events. However you
can subscribe to the 'Survival
International' newsletter to get a minute by
minute update on developments. (They are completely safe -
you do not get any other Junk Mail or unsolicited pleas for
donations etc.)
This
is also a good place to start getting involved if you feel
strongly about the rights of the Indigenous Peoples of the
World.
I
will be updating my Current Affairs page shortly with the
latest on the Court victory and unfolding events.
|
Mike's memories
are touched with sadness as he saw these people catapulted into
the modern world at a pace too fast for successful assimilation.
Inevitable changes have been forced upon them, sometimes in the
name of modernisation and, in other instances, by those chasing
purely political or commercial objectives. Very rarely were they
given the opportunity to adjust and adapt at a more organic pace
that may have resulted in some successful transitions.
Argument and
debate about these changes continues to rage, while the very
subject of that discussion disintegrates around them. These people
really are in their twilight years, as the last cohesive bands of
Bushmen dissolve and fade into the African dust. This is not
intended as a critical assessment of the different opinions and
strategies applied, but merely as a beginners introduction to a
culture worthy of greater respect and to encourage active dialogue
and a better understanding of the few remaining old world
cultures.
Who
are the Bushmen?
Woven within
a tapestry of mystique and legend, the Bushmen have been known by
many names throughout recorded history. This is an attempt to strip
away some of the romantic notions and show them as a real people
facing outside pressures in a very real and often harsh world. Although
the most studied anthropological group in the world, there are still
many misconceptions concerning them, not least of them the beliefs
that they are just another African Tribe, that they are truly Nomadic
(in the same manner as the Bedouin), that they all speak a common
tongue and that those living in the deserts were driven there by
white settlers. Many of these beliefs can be rooted in ignorance,
prejudice & inaccurate observations by early settlers and explorers
while many other misconceptions, although having some small underlying
element of truth, are fundamentally misleading and inaccurate.
The Bushmen,
often referred to as the San or the generic term Khoisan, are the
remnants of Africa's oldest cultural group, genetically the closest
surviving people to the original Homo-Sapien core from which the
Negro emerged. They are small in stature generally with light yellowish
skin, which wrinkles very early in life. Despite the later massive
expansion of the pastoral and agrarian tribal cultures, those Bushman
groups that utilised environments that were unsuitable for farming,
survived until fairly recently with a high level of genetic purity.
They were
hunter/gatherers, with traditionally about 70/80% of their diet
consisting of plant food, including berries, nuts, roots and
melons gathered primarily by the women. The remaining 20/30% was
meat, hunted by the men, using poisoned arrows and spears. Their
hunting & gathering economy and social structure had remained
virtually unchanged for tens of thousands of years until very
recently, a socio-economic culture that has sustained mankind
universally during their evolution until the advent of
agriculture. The Bushmen did not farm or keep livestock, having no
concept of the ownership of land or animal.
Their social
structure is not Tribal because they have no paramount leader and
their ties of kinship are fairly relaxed. They are a loosely knit
family culture where decisions are made by universal discussion
and agreement by consensus. An individual's opinion is naturally
weighted according to their level of skill and experience in the
particular field of discussion.
Families within
a clan would speak a common language but neighboring clans would
usually speak a different tongue, although there would normally
be a fair degree of similarity & understanding between them.
As you will appreciate, the further afield the clans, the less commonality
in language and vocabulary. Get a better idea from the Families
& Clans Page, which explains the broad Khoisan language
family groups.
Bushmen are
generally nomadic within fairly limited boundaries, governed by
the proximity of other families and clans. As a very loose
guideline, the territory of a family may stretch to a 25-mile
circle. Obviously, if there are no other bordering clans or other
people these areas may stretch further, as far as is needed to
ensure adequate food and water sources.
The roles of
men & women were very distinct and rarely overlap, which is
a characteristic almost universal amongst hunter/gatherers the world
over. It based on survival needs encouraging the most efficient
utilisation of available skills and resources. Despite what is often
perceived as a very sexist society, the importance of women is very
high within the group and their opinions often take precedence,
particularly where food is concerned.
It is very
difficult today to find genetically pure lines, but in some areas
groups can be found which appear to have little or no
interbreeding with other peoples and cultures. It is even more
difficult to find Bushmen who still totally reliant on traditional
methods of survival. The reasons for this are very varied and
often the cause of much academic, ideological, economic and
political conflict. Without pointing fingers I will try to explain
the different forces that have impacted most heavily on these "First
People" of Africa.
Names
|
Bushmen
- A term first applied by white explorers and settlers over
200 years ago. It was in those days a derogatory term applied
to people held in very low esteem by the whites, the Bantu
& the Khoi khoi. The Bantu tribes used various names including
BaSarwa (a Tswana term).
San
- The term used by the Khoi khoi. Although it is difficult
to get a literal translation, the word was far from complimentary
as these people despised the Bushmen as scavengers. In the
1960's it was first used by the Harvard Kalahari Research
Group, although there is apparently some evidence of a German
professor first coining the word in the 1950's in place of
the term "Bushman" which he deemed offensive. Ironic
that he replaced it with a word that was even more derogatory.
Anyone disputing this should visit the Ju/wasi Bushmen in
Hereroland, eastern Namibia, and call them "San".
Their response will be colorful to say the least. Although
I would much rather an actual Bushman term be adopted such
as Khwe (Variations of this name, generally meaning "The
People", can be found throughout Botswana) various Bushmen
groups in Namibia seemed to have accepted "San"
as a suitable name. The situation is currently very convoluted
but a good overview can be found at http://www.kalaharipeoples.org/documents/San-term.htm
Khoikhoi
- A people found scattered throughout southern Africa who
were genetically similar to the Bushmen and speak a language
akin to the Bushman tongue using the click consonants. They
keep sheep, goats and latterly cattle, unlike the Bushmen
who traditionally kept no livestock. Various theories exist
as to the origins of this socio-economic transition. My best
guess is that their roots lay in at least 2 major interactions
with Arabs or other peoples of the Middle East. Khoi is their
own name for themselves and is now used by most people because
the Dutch term "Hottentot" was considered derogatory.
During the white expansion there was significant interbreeding,
first with whites and later with Bantu. From this interaction
specific clans emerged bearing names such as Witboois and
Afrikaner (not to be confused with the white Afrikaaners),
with pride. Many of these groups moved to the North to escape
persecution.
Khoisan
- The term most applied by academia today, referring to the
Bushman/Khoi gene pool or, as is often stated, applying to
all those people sharing related languages that use the Click
Consonants. Still, I feel, not a respectful term as in incorporates
the Khoikhoi term San.
Bantu
- A generic term applied to African Negroid tribal people
who migrated down from central Africa over millennia.
|
Where
do they live?
They can be
found in Southern Africa in the following countries, although I
stress that virtually none live purely by hunting and gathering
today.
Botswana,
Namibia, South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe and Angola, with loosely
related groups in Tanzania. Recorded history also placed them in
Lesotho and Mozambique.
Rock art and
archaeological evidence can place them as far north as Libya, Egypt,
Sudan and Ethiopia, with the evidence of legend & racial type
suggesting some traces remain in Kenya.
|